Existence and Knowledge

Existence and Knowledge

Understanding Political Thought: An Integration of the Views of Skinner, Oakeshott, and Spragens

Document Type : Research Article

Author
PhD student in political science at Tarbiat Modares University
Abstract
In this article, the author considers the views of Quentin Skinner, Michael Oakeshott, and Thomas Spragens on understanding political thought, and investigates the possibility of their integration.
Keywords

منابع

1-       Barry, B., Political Argument, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970.
2-       Dembski, W., “The Fallacy of Contextualism,” in The Princeton Theological Review, Oct. 1994, www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd, June 2006.
3-       Femia, J., “An Historicist Critique of Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas” in J. Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988, pp. 156-175.
4-       Jordan, S. and C. Nederman, “Between Sartori and Skinner: Methodological Problems in the Study of Comparative Political Thought” Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,Chicago, 2004.
5-       Kos, E. “The Text and Context in Oakeshott’s Political Philosophy” Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, 2002.
6-       Lively, J. and A. Reeve, “General Introduction” in J. Lively and A. Reeve (eds.), Modern Political Theory from Hobbes to Marx,London: Routledge, 1989, pp. 1-8.
7-       Mandell, D., “The History of Political Thought as a Vocation: a Pragmatist Defence” Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Political Theory Workshop,University of Chicago, 1998.
8-       Oakeshott, M., Morality and Politics in Modern Europe, London: Yale University Press, 1993.
9-       Palonen, K., Quentin Skinner: History, Politics, Rhetoric,Oxford: Polity Press, 2003.
10-    Skinner, Q., Visions of Politics, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
11-    Skinner, Q., et al. “Political Philosophy: the View from Cambridge” The Journal of Political Philosophy. Vol. 10, No. l, 2002, pp. 1-19.
12-    Spragens, Th., Understanding Political Theory,New York: St. Martins Press, 1976.
13-    Stevenson, L., “Contextualism” in T. Honderich (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 160.
14-    Strauss, Leo, “Political Philosophy and History” in Journal of the History ofIdeas, Vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 1949, pp. 30-50.
15-    Tuck, R. “The Contribution of History” in R. Goodin and Ph. Pettit (eds.),A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy,Oxford: Blackwell, 1993, pp.72-89.
16-    Vincent, A., “Introduction”in A. Vincent (ed.), Political Theory: Tradition and Diversity,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 1-27.
17-    Zuckert, M., Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 2002.
 
 
 
 
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.