Existence and Knowledge

Existence and Knowledge

An Explanation of Meaning and Content of Propositions according to the Deflationary Theory of Truth

Document Type : Review Article

Author
Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
According to the deflationary theory of truth, to assert that a proposition is true does not add any properties to that proposition. However, most of the theories of content and meaning take the concept of truth as a fundamental semantic concept and define other semantic concepts, such as meaning, according to it. In this article, we tried to show how it is possible to substitute the verification conditions instead of the concept of truth and justify the objective and social aspect of propositions through the users of a language. Also, we tried to show how semantic properties of the logical operators could be explained according to the deflationary conception of truth. Logical operators act as connectives for complex contents and without a deflationary explanation of their rule in sentences or arguments, our survey would be incomplete. Here we explained this rule according to the syntax of formal logic and accepted the equivalence schema as a universal proposition.
Keywords

Ayer, A. J. (1952). Language, Truth and Logic, Dover Books on Western Philosophy, 2nd ed., US: Dover Publications.
Carnap, Rudolph (2006), Philosophy and Logical Syntax, translated by Reza Mozamar, Tehran: Markaz Publishing. [In Persian]
Field, H. (1992). “Truth. Paul Horwich”, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 321–330.
Field, H. (1994). “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content”, Mind, Vol. 104, No. 411, pp. 249–285.
Forrest, P. (2020). “The Identity of Indiscernibles”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2020 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
Frege, G. (1892). “On Sinn and Bedeutung”, Zeitschrift fur philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, pp. 25-50. English translation can be found in many books, here I used: Max Black translation in: Frege Reader, edited by Michael Beaney, 2000, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Frege, G. (1918). “The Thought”. trans. A. Quinton and M. Quinton, Mind, Vol .65, pp. 289-311.
Grover, D. (1992). A Prosentential Theory of Truth, NJ: Princeton University.
Horwich, P. (1998a). Truth (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horwich, P. (1998b). Meaning (1st ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Horwich, P. (2005). From a Deflationary Point of View, U.S.A: Oxford University Press.
Kenny, A (ed.) (2005). The Wittgenstein Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.
Klinedinst, N., Rothschild, D. (2012). “Connectives without truth tables”, Nat Lang Semantics, No. 20, pp. 137–175.
Peacock, H. (2011). “Two kinds of ontological commitment”, The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 242, pp. 79-104.
Pratt, J. B. (1907). “Truth and Its Verification”, The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, Vol. 4, No. 12, P. 320
Putnam, H. (1973). “Meaning and Reference”, Journal of Philosophy, No. 70, pp. 699–711
Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1970). Philosophy of Logic, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ramsey, F. (1927). “Facts and Propositions”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. 7, pp. 153-70.
Soames, S. (1999). Understanding Truth, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
Tarski, A. (1944). “The Semantical Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics” as reprinted in Jay L. Garfield and Murray Kiteley (ed) (1991). Meaning and Tnrth, New York: Paragon House.
Wrigley, M. (1989). “The Origins of Wittgenstein's Verificationism”, Synthese, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 265-290
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.