Bibliography
Bishop, Michael A. “The Pessimistic Induction, the Flight to Reference and the Metaphysical Zoo”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17, no. 2, (2003): 161-178.
Boyd, Richard. “On the Current Status of Scientific Realism”, Erkenntnis 19, (1983): 45-90, reprinted in: The Philosophy of Science, ed. By: R. Boyd, P. Gasper, and J. D. Trout. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (1999):195-222.
Boyd, Richard. “Scientific Realism and Naturalist Epistemology”, in ms. Fodor, J. (1968), Psychological Explanation. New York: Random House, 1981.
Brush, S. G. “Dynamics of Theory Change: The Role of Predictions”, in D. Hull, M. Forbes and R. M. Burian (eds.), PSA 1994, Vol. 2. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan (1994): 133–145.
Carrier, M. “What is Wrong with the Miracle Argument”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 22, (1991): 23-36.
Cohnitz, Daniel and Marcus Rossberg. “Nelson Goodman”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/goodman/
Cumminsky, D. “Reference Failure and Scientific Realism: a Response to the Meta-induction”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 43 (1992): 21-40.
Devitt, M. Realism and Truth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Diéguz-Lucena, Antonio. “Why Does Laudan’s Confutation of Convergent Realism Fail?”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (2006): 393-403.
Duhem, P. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (2nd ed.) translated by P. Wiener, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, [1914]1991.
Earman, John. Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
Etemadoleslami Bakhtiari, M. M. An Analysis of Epistemological Justification of Inference to the Best Explanation, Ph.D. Thesis, M. Mousavi Karimi & E. Azadegan (supervisors), Tehran: Sharif University of Technology, 2016. [In Persian]
Hardin, C. L. & A. Rosenberg. “In defense of convergent realism”, Philosophy of Science 49 (1982): 604–615.
Henderson, Leah. “The Problem of Induction”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/induction-problem/
Hobbs, J. “A Limited Defense of the Pessimistic Induction”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 45(1994): 171–191.
Kitcher, P. The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Kukla, André. Studies in Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Ladyman, James. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge, 2002.
Lange, Marc. “Baseball, Pessimistic Inductions and the Turnover Fallacy”, Analysis 62, no. 276 (2002): 281-285.
Laudan, Larry. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48 (1981): 19-49.
Laudan, Larry. “Realism without the Real”, Philosophy of Science 51, no. 1 (Mar, 1984): 156-162.
Leplin, Jarett. “The Underdetermination of Total Theories”, Erkenntnis 47 (1997b): 203-215.
Leplin, Jarett. A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Pres, 1997a.
Lewis, Peter J. “Why the Pessimistic Induction is a Fallacy”, Synthese, 129 (2001): 371-380.
Maxwell, G. “The ontological status of theoretical entities”, in: Readings in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Baruch A. Brody, (1962/1970): 224-233. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
McAllister, James W. “Scientific Realism and the Criteria for Theory-Choice”, Erkenntnis 38 (1993): 203-222.
McMullin, E. “A Case for Scientific Realism”, in: Scientific Realism, Jarrett Leplin (ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Moazzenzadeh, Jahangir. Observable/Unobservable Distinction in Philosophy of Science, Ph.D. Thesis, M. Mousavi Karimi (supervisor), Tehran: Sharif University of Technology, 2016. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M. “Modern Cosmology, Creatio ex Nihilo and Creatio Continua”, Science and Religion Bulletin 4 (2000): 1-38. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M. “Scientific Realism and the Underdetermination Argument”, The Journal of Existence and Knowledge, Semi-Annual 7, no.1, Issue 13 (Spring & Summer 2020): 7- 46. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M. “Scientific Realism, Structural Realism, and the Pessimistic Meta-Induction Argument”, Philosophy of Science, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) Biannual Journal 12, no. 1 (Spring and Summer 2022): 153-179. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M. “The Origin of the Universe and Modern Cosmology”, Nameh-Ye Mofid: Quarterly Journal of Moid University 7 (2001): 209-238. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M. “The Pessimistic Meta-Induction Argument and Scientific Realism: The Referential Approaches”, Metaphysics, University of Isfahan E-ISSN: 2476-3276, Vol. 14, Issue 2, no. 34, (autumn and winter 2022): 57-84. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language and Religious Language. Qom: Mofid University Press, 2021. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M., and J. Moazzenzade. “The Problem of Unobservables: A Defense of Van Fraassen’s Distinction between Observables and Unobservables”, Researches on Metaphysics 7, Issue 20 (2015): 45-64. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M., and S. M. M. E’temad Al-Islami Bakhtiari. “Deficiency of Probabilistic Approach for Settling Voltaire’s Objection”, Methodology of Social Science and Humanities (MSSH) 25, Issue 98 (Spring 2019): 139-150. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M., and S. M. M. Etemadoleslami Bakhtiari. “An Analysis of Probabilistic Criteria in Inference to the Best Explanation”, Logical Studies, Article 2, Vol. 8, Issue 2 - Serial no. 16 (Summer and Autumn 2017): 25-48. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M., and S. M. M. Etemadoleslami Bakhtiari. “Inference to the Best Explanation and “the Bad Lot Objection”,” Hasti va Shenakht (Journal of Existence and Knowledge) 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4, (Autumn & Winter 2015): 111-130. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, M., and S. M. M. Etemadoleslami Bakhtiari. “The Relation between Explanatory Virtues and the Limitation of Hungerford’s Objection”, Zehn (Mind), Serial Number 16, Issue 63 (Autumn 2015): 131-164. [In Persian]
Mousavi Karimi, Mirsaeid. “Adolf Grünbaum on the Steady-State Theory and Creatio Continua of Matter out of Nothing”, Zygon 46, no. 4 (December 2011): 857-871.
Mousavi Karimi, Mirsaeid.
Scientific Realism and the Fundamentality of Existence, 2009. Avail. At:
https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.503882.
Musgrave, Alan (1988) “The Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism”, in: Relativism and Realism in Science, Robert Nola (ed.). Kluwer: Dordrecht, (1988): 229–252.
Nagel, Thomas. The Last Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Newton-Smith, W. H. The Rationality of Science. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, 1981.
Niiniluoto, I. “Reference Invariance and Truthlikeness”, Philosophy of Science 64, no. 4. (1997): 546-554.
Niiniluoto, I. Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
Niiniluoto, I. Is Science Progressive? Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1984.
Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1971.
Poincaré, H. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover. Republication of the 1905 edition, Walter Scott Publishing Company, [1905] 1952.
Psillos, Stathis (1996) “Scientific Realism and the ‘Pessimistic Induction’ ”, Philosophy of Science 63, Supplement: Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers (Sep. 1996): 5306-5314.
Psillos, Stathis. “A Philosophical Study Of The Transition From The Caloric Theory Of Heat To Thermodynamics: Resisting the pessimistic meta-induction”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 25 (2) (1994):159-190.
Psillos, Stathis. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge, 1999.
Putnam, H. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
Putnam, H. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.
Saatsi, Juha. “On The Pessimistic Induction & Two Fallacies”, Philosophy of Science 72 (December 2005): 1088–1098. Available at: HUhttp://philsciarchive. pitt.edu/archive/00001943/
Saatsi, Juha. “Reconsidering the Fresnel–Maxwell theory shift: how the realist can have her cake and EAT it too”, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 36 (2005) 509-538.
Salmon, W. C. et al. Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance.
Smart J. J. C. Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.
Stanford, P. Kyle. “Pyrrhic Victories for Scientific Realism”, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. C, no. 11 (November 2003): 553-572.
Weston, Thomas. “Approximate Truth and Scientific Realism”, Philosophy of Science 59, no 1 (1992): 53-74.
Weston, Thomas. “Approximate truth”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 16 (1987): 203–22.
Worrall, John. “Fresnel, Poisson and the 'White Spot': The Role of Successful Pre- diction in Theory-acceptance”, in D. Gooding et al (ed.), The Uses of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1989a): 135–57.
Worrall, John. “How to Remain (Reasonably) Optimistic: Scientific Realism and the "Luminiferous Ether" ”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol One: Contributed Papers (1994): 334-342.
Worrall, John. “Scientific Discovery and Theory-Confirmation”, in: J. Pitt (ed.), Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company (1985): 301-331.
Worrall, John. “Scientific Realism and Scientific Change”, The Philosophical Quarterly 32, no. 128, Special Issue: Scientific Realism (Jul 1982): 201-231.
Worrall, John. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?”, Dialectica 43 (1989): 99-124.
