Existence and Knowledge

Existence and Knowledge

Argument from the Order in the Universe and Double Task of Theologian towards It

Document Type : Research Article

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Mofid University, Qom, Iran.
Abstract
Among the various arguments which have been presented to prove the existence of God, argument from the order in the universe is unique from many respects. On the one hand, the vast majority of religious believers cite the same argument and on the other hand, religious Scriptures, especially Islamic texts have repeatedly raised this argument and have invited people to pay attention to it. The theologian cannot deal with this argument, like other arguments. He can pass along any argument and refuse it, but if he does not accept argument from the order in the universe, first he must find an alternative argument to offer to the masses, and secondly, he must defend religious Scriptures why such texts have presented a flawed argument and indeed the people have been deceived. The strange point is that though the Islamic scriptures have paid much more attention to this argument in comparison with Christian texts, but Christian scholars and theologians more than Muslim scholars have considered this argument and defended it. It appears that in the history of philosophy and Islamic theology enough attention has not been paid to it. In the new era in the West, some people like David Hume and Immanuel Kant have criticized this argument and arisen several difficulties related to this argument which the review and study of the main difficulties show that none of them is certain and proven and thus the argument from the order in the universe can survive despite such objections.
 
Keywords

  1. Quran
  2. Bible, Holy Book Distribution Association. [In Persian]
  3. Allahbedashti, Ali (2011). Monotheism and Divine Attributes, Qom: Qom University. [In Persian]
  4. Fakhr Razi (1987). Al-Mattaleb Al-Aali, Beirut: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Arabi. [In Persian]
  5. Gilson, Etienne (1996). Fundamentals of Christian Philosophy, translated by Mohammad Mohammad Rezaei and Mahmoud Mousavi, Qom: Islamic Advertisement Office Publishing Center. [In Persian]
  6. Hick, John (1993). Philosophy of Religion, translated by Bahram Rad, Tehran: Al-Huda International Publication. [In Persian]
  7. Hume, David (2009). Discourses on Natural Religion, translated by Hamid Eskandari, Tehran: Alam Publication. [In Persian]
  8. Javadi Amoli, Abdullah (???). Explaining the Evidence of the Proof of God, Qom: Esraa Publication. [In Persian]
  9. Majlisi (1983). Baharalanvar, Beirut: Dar Al-Ahya Al-Tarath Al-Arabi. [In Persian]

10. Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taghi (1991). Teaching Ideas, Tehran: Islamic Advertisements Organization Publishing Center. [In Persian]

11. Mohammad Rezaei, Mohammad (2002). “The Argument of Order”, in a paper on new theology, Qom: Qom University. محمدرضایی، محمد (1381)، «برهان نظم»، در جستارهایی در کلام جدید، قم: دانشگاه قم.

12. Peterson, Michael, et al. (2008). Religious Reason and Belief, translated by Ahmad Naraghi, et al., Tehran: Tarhee Noo Publication. [In Persian]

13. Steed, Christopher (2001). Philosophy in Ancient Christianity, translated by Abdul Rahim Soleimani, Qom: Center for the Study and Research of Religions and Denominations. [In Persian]

14. Swinburne, Richard (2002). Is There a God?, translated by Mohammad Javadan, Qom: Mofid University Press. [In Persian]

15. Tabatabai, Mohammad Hossein (1984). Al-Mizan, Beirut: Al-A'lami Institute for Publications. [In Persian]

16. Taftazani, Sa'ad al-Din (1989). Sharh al-Muqassid, Qom: Manshorat Alsharif Alrazi. [In Persian]

17. Thyssen, Henry (???). Christian Theology, translated by T. Makaelian, Tehran: Hayat Abadi Publication. [In Persian]

Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.