Existence and Knowledge

Existence and Knowledge

A criticism on Kripke's Critique of Frege's Theory of Meaning in the Process of Signification and Confirmation of the Reference

Document Type : Research Article

Author
PhD student in modern philosophy, Mofid University, Qom, Iran.
Abstract
In Gottlub Frege's theory of the meaning of particular names and his descriptions of the meaning-making process of that, and subsequently, the process of conformation and fixing the references through the proposed meaning, Kripke introduces criticism. By misrepresenting the dual processes of Frege's theory, and consequently Russell's, Kripke argues that this theory is ineffective and misleading.
My main purpose is to discuss Kripke's most important description of the theory, which is reflected in "naming and necessity" and to challenge Kripke's critique. Accordingly, I believed that Kripke's criticism of Frege for the confusion between the two processes of fixing and meaning-making in a sense in the theory is incorrect, and Kripke created this view and mistakenly attributes this idea to Frege at first. Actually, Kripke made this idea for Frege and from his theories in Sence and Reference. But Frege never mentioned this misleading in the process of fixing the sense for the references. Kripke after this creation began to critique on Frege in this.
For this conclusion, we first need to explain Frege's theory of meaning and then we will research in terms of two processes of references and meaning fixation. This article claims that the two cannot be traced in the Frege's views, and Kripke has not used sufficient precision, deliberately or inadvertently, in his description of this theory.
Keywords

ـ ملکی، علیرضا (1390)، اندیشه از دیدگاه فرگه، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، استاد راهنما: سیدمسعود موسوی، دانشگاه مفید.
 -Berg, Jonathan (2014), Naming, Necessity and More: Explorations in the Philosophical Work of Saul Kripke, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
 -Berger, Alan (2011), Saul Kripke, New York: Cambridge University Press.
 -Burge, Tyler (2005), Truth, Thought, Reason, Essays on Frege, New York: Oxford University Press.
 -Burgess, John P. (2013), Kripke, Cambridge: Polity.
 -Carl, Wolfgang (1995), Frege’s Theory of Sense and Reference, Its Origins and Scope, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 -Dummett, Michael (1973), Frege, Philosophy of Language, New York: Harper & Row.
 -Fitch, G. W. (2004), Saul Kripke, Montreal: Mcgill-Queen’s University Press.
 -Frege, Gottlob (1948), “Sense And Reference”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 57, Issue 3.
 -Horty, John (2007), Frege on Definitions, A Case Study of Semantic Content, New York: Oxford University Press.
 -Kenny, Anthony (1995), Frege: An Introduction to the Founder of Modern Analytic Philosophy, London: Blackwell.
 -Kripke, Saul A. (2001), Naming and Necessity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 -Newen, Albert & Ulrich Nortmann & Rainer Stuhlmann-Laeisz (Ed.) (2001), Building on Frege: New Essay on Sense, Content, and Concept, Stanford: Center for Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
 -Noonan, Harold (2013), Routledge Philosophy Guide Book to Kripke and Naming and Necessity, New York: Routledge.
 -Noonan, Harold W. (2001), Frege, A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity.
 -Speaks, Jeff (2007), A Guide to Kripke’s Attack on Descriptivism in Lectures 1&2 Of Naming &Necessity, (PDF Ver.).
 -Textor, Mark (2011), Routledge Philosophy Guide Book to Frege on Sence and Reference, New York: Routledge.
 -Weiner, Joan (2005), Frege Explained: From Arithmetic to Analytic Philosophy, Illinois: Open Court.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.