Existence and Knowledge

Existence and Knowledge

A comparison of Mulla Sadra's and William Rowe's Perspectives on "God's freedom"

Document Type : Research Article

Author
Ph.D. in philosophy of religion, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Mulla Sadra and William Rowe, representing divergent philosophical traditions, addressed the issue of "God's freedom" and arrived at disparate conclusions. Both philosophers concur that God's will for the creation of the world possesses an eternal necessity. However, their dissimilarity arises from Mulla Sadra's adherence to a compatibilist perspective on freedom. He believes that as in the case of man, where the necessity per aliud of the will does not conflict with the freedom, in the case of God, the eternal necessity of the will does not conflict with his freedom. Conversely, William Rowe, an advocate of the libertarian concept of freedom, posits that the eternal necessity of God's will leaves no room for His freedom. Drawing a parallel between the necessity per aliud in human beings and the eternal necessity in God, according to Rowe, is an erroneous analogy. In this article, through an examination of these philosophers' arguments, we arrive at the stance that William Rowe's position holds greater defensibility. Firstly, his viewpoint aligns more harmoniously with our linguistic and moral intuitions. Secondly, there are sound justifications for distinguishing between necessity per aliud and eternal necessiity, in terms of determinism
Keywords

Subjects


Bibliography
Clarke, Samuel. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings. Edited By Ezio Vailati. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Edwards, Jonathan. Freedom of the Will. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1754. From: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/edwards/will.html. Publisher: Date Created: 2000-07-09. Accessed July 9, 2023.
Leibniz, G. W. New Essays on Human Understanding. Translated by Alfred Gideon Langley. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company, 1916.
Leibniz, G. W. Theodicy. Edited by Austin Farrer. Translated by E.M. Huggard. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1996.
Leibniz, G. W., and Samuel Clarke. Correspondence. Edited with Introduction by Roger Ariew. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 2000.
Morriston, Wesley. “Is God Significantly Free?.” Faith and Philosophy 2, no. 3 (July 1985). 10.5840/faithphil19852331.
Motahhari, Morteza. Majmoeh Asar, Vol. 5, Tehran: Sadra Publication, 2007. [In Persian]
Row, William. Can God Be Free?. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Ṣadr ad-Dīn Shīrāzī, Muhammad Ibn Ibrahim. Al-Hekmeh Al-Motaali Fi Al-Asfar Al-Aghliyeh Al-Arbaee. Vol 6, edited by Ahmad Ahmadi. Under the supervision of Seyyed Mohammad Khamenei. Tehran: Sadra's wisdom Institute, 2002. [In Arabic]
Ṣadr ad-Dīn Shīrāzī, Muhammad Ibn Ibrahim. Al-Hekmeh Al-Motaali Fi Al-Asfar Al-Aghliyeh Al-Arbaee. Vol 7, edited by D.r Maghsoud Mohammadi. Tehran: Sadra's wisdom Institute, 2001. [In Arabic]
Ṣadr ad-Dīn Shīrāzī, Muhammad Ibn Ibrahim. Almabda-va-Almaad. edited by Sayyed Jalal-ed-Din Ashtiani. Qom: 2001. [In Arabic]
Sobhani, Jafar. Al-Mohazerat fi al-Elahiyat. Qom: The Society of Seminary Teachers Publication, 1994. [In Arabic]
Swinburne, Richard. Revelation from Metaphor to Analogy. Oxford: Oxford University press, 2007.
Tusi, Muhammad Ibn Muhammad. Sharh Al - Esharat Va Al – Tanbihat. Qom: al-balagha Publication, 2004. [In Arabic]
Wainwright, William J. Philosophy of Religion. Translated by Alireza Kermani. Qom: Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute, 2011. [In Persian]
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.