Existence and Knowledge

Existence and Knowledge

New Conditions for the Validity of Argument: Logical or Epistemological (Acquaintance with the types of fallacies in a critique)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Ph. D in philosophical Logic, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
In classical logic, the rules of inference allow any conclusion to be deduced from the premises of an argument if they are inconsistent, just as they allow the conclusion of the deduction to be deduced from any premise if it is a theorem. In the book "A New Outlook on the Elements of Logic", 2nd edition, 2023, Hajihosseini introduced a revised definition for the validity of an argument by adding two new conditions to known criteria for validity. According to this definition, an argument is valid if and only if, in addition to the conditions of validity in classical logic, if the conclusion of the argument is not inconsistent, its premises together do not form an inconsistent set. Moreover, if all the premises of the argument are not axioms or theorems/ logical truths, its conclusion is not a theorem/ logical truth.

Asadollah Fallahi, in his article Logic and Informativeness in Hajhosseini's Systems, Existence and Knowledge, Vol.9, No.1, criticizes the foundations of logical systems of this book and claims that the new conditions for the validity of an argument are epistemological and not logical conditions. In the forthcoming article, we address these critiques and demonstrate that they are susceptible to numerous fallacies. Furthermore, we show that Fallahi's proposal to transform the new conditions into epistemic conditions is based on unaccepted assumptions.
Keywords

Subjects


Bibliography
 
Fallahi, Asadollah. “Hajhosseini’s Non-Truth-Functional Semantics”, Philosophy 21, no.1 (2022): 149- 166. [In Persian]
Fallahi, Asadollah. “Hajhosseini’s Truth-Functional Semantics”, Philosophy and Kalam 56, no.1 (2022): 115- 129. [In Persian]
Fallahi, Asadollah. “Hajhosseini's Non-Truth-Functional Logic”, Research in Logic 14, no.1 (2022): 103- 126. [In Persian]
Fallahi, Asadollah. “Hajhosseini's Truth-Functional Logic”, Ayeneh Ma'refat 23, no.1 (2022): 21- 43. [In Persian]
Fallahi, Asadollah. “Logic and Informativeness in Hajhosseini's Logical Systems”, Existence and Knowledge 9, no.1 (2022): 89- 113. [In Persian]
Fallahi, Asadollah. “On Historical Aspects of Hajhosseini’s Logical Systems”, Knowledge 16, no.1 (2022): 151- 170. [In Persian]
Hajhosseini, Mortaza and Hamide Bahmanpour. “A Critical Review of the Critique of the Truth Functional System of Basic Propositional Logic”, Ayeneh Ma'refat 23, no. 3, (2022): 167-200. [In Persian]
Hajhosseini, Mortaza and Hamide Bahmanpour. “A Critical Review of the Article: On Historical Aspects of Hajihosseini’s Logical Systems”, Research in Logic 14, no.2 (2022): 59-78. [In Persian]
Hajhosseini, Mortaza and Hamide Bahmanpour. “Critical Analysis of a Critique of the Truth-Functional System Semantics”, Philosophy and Kalam 56, no. 2 (2023): 441-463. [In Persian]
Hajhosseini, Mortaza and Hamide Bahmanpour. “Critical Analysis of a Critique of the Non-Truth-Functional System Semantics”, Research in Logic 14, no.2 (2022). [In Persian]
Hajhosseini, Mortaza. Two Non-Classical Logic Systems, A new Outlook on Elements of Logic, Vol. 1: Propositional Logic. Isfahan: Isfahan University Publication, 2023. [In Persian]
Ibn Sina, Hossein. Al-Shifa, Al-Mantiq, Al-Qiyas. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Arabi littibaa wa al-Nashr, 1964. [In Arabic]
Sawi, Sahlan. Al-Basair Al-Nasiriyya. Edited by Rafiq Al-Ajam. Beyrut: Dar al-Fikr al-Lubnani, 1993. [In Arabic]
Tusi, Nasir al-Din. Taadil al-Miayar fi Sharh Tanzil al-Afkar. In Manteq va Mabaheth-e Alfaz. Collected by Mahdi Mohaqqeq. Tehran: Tehran University, 1974, 137-248. [In Arabic]
Zakiani, Gholamreza. “On Mathematical Logic (Truth-functional View)”, Maqalat va Barrasiha 76, no. 2 (2002): 31-52. [In Persian]
Zakiani, Gholamreza. “On Mathematical Logic (Truth-functional View)”, Falsafeh 3, no. 1 (2002): 123-149. [In Persian]
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.