The Legitimacy of the Belief in God in Carnapian Philosophical Framework

Moosavi Karimi, Seyed Masoud; Pardechi, Seyed Hosein

doi:10.22096/ek.2021.529755.1353

The Legitimacy of the Belief in God in Carnapian Philosophical Framework

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Seyed Masoud Moosavi Karimi ¹

Seyed Hosein Pardechi ²

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Mofid University, Qom, Iran

² PhD student in Modern Philosophy, Mofid University, Qom, Iran.

10.22096/ek.2021.529755.1353

Abstract

Carnap, the most prominent logical positivist, has a famous sentence that metaphysics is nonsense. At the first glance, it seems that any religious belief, especially the belief in God, is illegitimate according to Carnap’s philosophical principles. Since Carnap holds the same view regarding the meaningfulness of ethical beliefs and at the same time regards ethical behaviour valuable, it looks in similar way that at its best, in Carnapian framework, it might be reasonable to value following religions and to reject religious belief simultaneously. However, contrary to such superficial judgment, though the belief in philosophers’ God has no place in Carnap’s philosophical framework, the belief in religions’ God is totally consistent with his philosophical principles. For Carnap, experience is the only source of knowledge and all empirical judgements are merely probable. However, it is reasonable to believe and be certain about the truth of empirical sentences. Here, we show that one can establish one’s belief in religious factual claims, including claims about God, in the same way that Carnap establishes his belief in the claims of natural sciences.

Keywords

Rudolf Carnap

Confirmability

Meaningfulness

Religious Belief

Proof of the Existence of God

Bibliography

Carnap Rudolf. “Carnap’s Intellectual Autobiography”. in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Ed. Paul Arthur Schilpp. Northwestern University, IL, Open Court, 1963.

Carnap Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology”. in A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. The University of Chicago Press, 1950.

Carnap Rudolf. “Intellectual Autobiography”. in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. ed. P. A. Schilpp. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1963.

Carnap Rudolf. “Testability and meaning 2”. in Philosophy of Science. Vol. 3, No. 4. The Chicago University Press, 1937. http://www.jstor.org/stable/184580.

Carnap Rudolf. “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language”. in Logical Positivism. ed. A. J. Ayer. Toronto: Collier-Macmillan, 1959. http://www.scribd.com/pdfs.

Carnap Rudolf. Philosophy and Logical Syntax. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1996.

Carnap, Rudolf. “Testability and Meaning 1”. in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3, No. 4. The University of Chicago Press, 1936. http://www.jstor.org/stable/184400.

Collins, Robin. “The Fine-Tuning Design Argument”. in Michael J. Murray (Author). Reason for the Hope Within, 1999.

Moosavi Karimi, SeyedMasoud. Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, University of Ottawa, 2012.

Patterson, Michael, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, and David Basinger. Religious Wisdom and Belief, Translated by Ahmad Naraghi and Ebrahim Soltani, Tehran: Tarhe Noo, 2004. [In Persian]

Russell, Bertrand. Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects. London: Routledge, 2004.

Swinburne, Richard. "Argument of Order", Translated by Hashem Morvarid, Contemporary Approaches in Religious Epistemology, edited by R. Douglas Gayot and Brendan Steamon, Tehran: Ney, 1397. [In Persian]

Send comment about this article

Name *

Enter Name.

Email Address *

Enter a valid email address.

Affiliation *

Enter a vaid affiliation.

Comments *

Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)

Security Code *