سیاهه منابع
الف-منابع لاتین:
Alston, William P. “The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification.” Philosophical Perspectives 2 (1988): 99-257 https://doi.org/10.2307/2214077.
Archer, Alfred. “Do We Need to Make Room for Quasi-Supererogation?.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 50, no. 2 (2016): 51-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-015-9515-8.
Archer, Alfred. “What’s the Use of Non-Moral Supererogation?.” In Handbook of Supererogation, edited by David Heyd. Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-99-3633-5_14.
Booth, Anthony Robert. “All Things Considered Duties to Believe.” Synthese 187, no. 2 (2012): 17-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9857-5.
Hale, Susan C. “Against Supererogation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28, no. 4 (1991): 85-273.
Hall, Richard J., and Charles R. Johnson. “The Epistemic Duty to Seek More Evidence.” American Philosophical Quarterly 35, no. 2 (1998): 39-129.
Hedberg, Trevor. “Epistemic Supererogation and Its Implications.” Synthese 191, no. 15 (2014): 37-3621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0483-5.
Heyd, David. “Supererogation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2019.
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. “Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation.” Kant-Studien 62, nos. 1–4 (1971): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1971.62.1-4.55.
Hope, Simon. “Kantian Imperfect Duties and Modern Debates over Human Rights.” Journal of Political Philosophy 22, no. 4 (2014): 415-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12026.
Horgan, Terry, and Mark Timmons. “Untying a Knot from the inside out: Reflections on the ‘Paradox’ of Supererogation.” Social Philosophy and Policy 27, no. 2 (2010): 29–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026505250999015X.
Lackey, Jennifer. “Epistemic Duties Regarding Others.” In Epistemic Duties: New Arguments, New Angles, edited by Scott Stapleford and Kevin McCain. Routledge, 2020.
Li, Han. “A Theory of Epistemic Supererogation.” Erkenntnis 83, no. 2 (2018): 67-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9893-3.
McElwee, Brian. “Supererogation Across Normative Domains.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95, no. 3 (2017): 16-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1253760.
Nelson, M. T. “We Have No Positive Epistemic Duties.” Mind 119, no. 473 (2010): 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzp148.
Ryan, Sharon. “Doxastic Compatibilism and the Ethics of Belief.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 114, no. 1/2 (2003): 47–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024409201289.
Saunders, Joe, Joe Slater, and Martin Sticker. “Kant and Overdemandingness I: The Demandingness of Imperfect Duties.” Philosophy Compass 19, no. 6 (2024): e12998. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12998.
Schroeder, S. Andrew. “Imperfect Duties, Group Obligations, and Beneficence.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 11, no. 5 (2014): 557-584. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-4681020.
Stapleford, Scott. “Epistemic Duties and Failure to Understand One’s Evidence.” Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16, no. 1 (2012): 77-147. https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n1p147.
Stapleford, Scott. “Imperfect Epistemic Duties and the Justificational Fecundity of Evidence.” Synthese 190, no. 18 (2013): 75-4065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0249-5.
Stapleford, Scott, and Kevin McCain. “Bound by the Evidence.” In Epistemic Duties: New Arguments, New Angles, edited by Scott Stapleford and Kevin McCain. Routledge, 2020.
Statman, Daniel. “Who Needs Imperfect Duties?.” American Philosophical Quarterly 33, no. 2 (1996): 24-211.
Stocker, Michael. “Acts, Perfect Duties, and Imperfect Duties.” The Review of Metaphysics 20, no. 3 (1967): 17-507.
The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica. “Ought Implies Can.” In Encyclopedia Britannica. 2018. https://www.britannica.com/topic/ought-implies-can.
Thorstad, David. “There Are No Epistemic Norms of Inquiry.” Synthese 200, no. 5 (2022): 410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03896-4.
Wood, Allen W. “The Supreme Principle of Morality.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, edited by Paul Guyer. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Wrenn, Chase B. “Why There Are No Epistemic Duties.” Dialogue 46, no. 1 (2007): 36-115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221730000158X.
