نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه-منطق دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
2 استاد مؤسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران
3 دانشیار دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
4 دانشیار دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
پس از معرفی مسئله ابهام و پارادوکس خرمن در فلسفه زبان و توصیفی از نسخه استاندارد نظریه معرفتی درباره ابهام، نتایج این نظریه در دو موضع مورد نقد قرار می‌گیرد. نخست اینکه توجیه معرفت شناختی نظریه مستلزم پارادوکس‌هایی مشابه پارادوکس خرمن است؛ و دوم اینکه توضیح روانشناختی مناسبی برای شهودهای مخالف نظریه وجود ندارد. نتیجه این خواهد بود که نظریه معرفتی نتوانسته از عهده وظایف یک نظریه درباره ابهام برآید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Vagueness, a Critical Review of a Counter-Intuitive Theory
نویسندگان [English]
- Davoud Hosseini 1
- Zia Movahed 2
- Lotfollah Nabavi 3
- Seyed Mohammad Ali Hojatti 4
1 PhD student in Logic of Tarbiat Modares University
2 Professor of the Research Institute of Iranian Wisdom and Philosophy
3 Associate Professor of Tarbiat Modares University
4 Associate Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
In this paper, at first, we describe the standard version of epistemic theory of vagueness. After that we criticize two parts of that theory: first we argue that its solution to the epistemic problem entails paradoxes other than sorites; then we argue that the theory cannot justify its counter-intuitiveness. We will conclude that these objections can refute the standard version of epistemic theory of vagueness.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Vagueness
- Borderline-Cases
- Sorites Paradox
- Intuition
- Inexact Knowledge
منابع
- Cargile, James, "The Sorites Paradox", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20, pp. 193-202, Reprinted in Keefe & Smith eds, 1996.
- Gomez-Torrente, Mario, "Two Problems for an Epistemicist View of Vagueness", in E. Villanueva (ed.), Philosophical Issues VIII: Truth, Ridgeview, Atascadero (California), 1997.
- Gomez-Torrente, Mario, "Vagueness and Margin for Error Principles", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2002, 64, pp. 107-26.
- Keefe, Rosanna, Theories of Vagueness, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
- Keefe, Rosanna & Smith, Peter eds, Vagueness: A Reader, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1996.
- McGee, Van & McLaughlin, Brian P, "Review of Vagueness", by Timothy Williamson, Linguistics and Philosophy, 1998, 21, pp. 221-35.
- Russell, Bertrand, (1923), "Vagueness", Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Psychology 1, pp. 84-92, Reprinted in Keefe & Smith eds, (1996).
- Sainsbury, Mark, "Vagueness, Ignorance and Margin for Error", (Critical Notice of Timothy Williamson: Vagueness), British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1995, 46, pp. 589-601.
- Sainsbury M. and Williamson T, "Sorites, In Hale B and Wright", C (eds.) A Companion in the Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Blackwell, 1997, pp. 458–484.
- Sorensen, Roy, A, Blindspots, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
- Tye, Michael, "Sorites Paradoxes and the Semantics of Vagueness", in Tomberlin, J (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives: Logic and Language. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview, 1994.
- Williamson, Timothy, "Inexact Knowledge", Mind, 1992a, 101, pp. 217-42.
- Williamson, Timothy, (1992b), "Vagueness and Ignorance", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 66, pp. 145-62, Reprinted in Keefe & Smith eds, (1996).
- Williamson, Timothy, "Vagueness", London: Routledge, 1994.
- Williamson, Timothy, "Wright on the Epistemic Conception of Vagueness", Analysis, 1996, 56, pp. 39.
- Williamson Timothy, "Reply to Commentators", Philosophy and henomenological Research, Vol. 57, 1997a, No. 4, pp. 945-953.
- Williamson, Timothy, "Imagination Stipulation and Vagueness", in Villanueva, E (ed.) Philosophical Issues: Truth, Atascadero: Ridgeview, 1997b
- Williamson, Timothy, "Reply to McGee and McLaughlin", Linguistics and Philosophy, 2004, 27, pp. 113–22.
- Wright, Crispin, "The Epistemic Conception of Vagueness", Southern Journal of Philosophy (Supplement), 1995, 33, pp. 133-59.
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله